Overview cargo vent solutions for compliance with OSV Chemical code 1122(30).
3 ways to comply for existing vessels:


 

XPL - directional dispersion discharge

 

Submerged termination of pipe-away cargo vents

Advantages
- Harmful gases eliminated from deck area
- Complies with NMA alternative solutions
- Tank pressure below the required demand
for 0.6 bar
- Increased cargo deck space available

Disadvantages
- Not accepted by all classification societies
- Uncertain pressure condition in the cargo tank
- Flame arrester needed below pressure side
- Submerged pipe subject to biofouling
- Effective tank pressure still high

 

Directional dispersion discharge control of cargo vents

Advantages
- Harmful gases angled away and ejected into a natural ventilation zone
- Increased velocity for discharge.
- Extended directional dispersion
- Complies with NMA alternative solutions
- Tank pressure from 0.2 bar

Disadvantages
- Alternative solution accepted by Norwegian Maritime Authority only
- Harmful gases not fully eliminated from deck area (compared to submerged solution)
- Cargo deck space is still restricted
(compared to submerged solution)

 

Submerged over pressure termination

 

Increased pressure setting to 0.6 bar on cargo tank and relief vent valves

Advantages
- Complies with OSVCC 4.3.7
- Marginally fewer opening cycles

Disadvantages
- Operating pressure to high for exisiting fleet
- Uneconomical complexity of conversion
- Harmful gases still not eliminated from deck
- Cargo space limitations


Conversion impact/complexity for existing vessels, 1122(30) carriage of toxic cargoes

…for deeper insight contact sales@ventiq.com or call us at +4770026542